| To: | Jerry <jerry@wicomtechnologies.com>, linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Au1xxx ethernet race condition? |
| From: | jaypee@hotpop.com |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:25:20 +0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <1905543925.20050811120527@wicomtechnologies.com> (from jerry@wicomtechnologies.com on Thu Aug 11 10:05:27 2005) |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1123749337l.30285l.5l@cavan> <1905543925.20050811120527@wicomtechnologies.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We are dealing with au1200 and there are some problems around at least with udp timeouts and maybe low perfomance. But it seems to be driver problems (occurs both in 2.4 and 2.6) besides au1200 does not use au1000_eth.c Maybe your problem is somewhere else, and maybe it is completely different. Agreed, I don't think au1000_eth.c is a problem as far throughput goes.- -- mailto:jaypee@hotpop.com http://www.jaypee.org.uk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFC+xmDZDxnKy3oOpYRAkAGAJjZLla7TN9Mcny1o9H/QAoJQpfiAKCFUDmU eOfmPvEPqbMgtpZxmK9Npg== =IrC3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 24K malta, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Au1xxx ethernet race condition?, jaypee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Au1xxx ethernet race condition?, Jerry |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Au1xxx ethernet race condition?, jaypee |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |