linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fwd: mips64 gdb problem

To: Bryan Althouse <bryan.althouse@3phoenix.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: mips64 gdb problem
From: Maxim Osipov <maxim.osipov@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:23:23 +0000
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FkomF0Dh1eDUdfuhoUUDUPWUyiG4wVydhg4v/I7uUmC95zVKjFQeQtGacnCPaQ+KFrTr8r65uf2LCWq2OpXzQjJVi82DCXP5ijf0TqZKvnLnzIoy84/NNkDHG+q5W+N67gvdH/0O4BJ2u6RqN9dPO1Uj+FWUBPf3GZEJKlxX9ao=
In-reply-to: <42e57109.14b0f52a.28ce.3671SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <42e57109.14b0f52a.28ce.3671SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.gmail.com>
Reply-to: maxim@mox.ru
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Nope.
BR,
Maxim

On 7/25/05, Bryan Althouse <bryan.althouse@3phoenix.com> wrote:
> I'm butting heads with this problem also.  I get the error below when
> running mips64-unknown-linux-gdb on a 64 bit mips binary.  Has anyone come
> up with a work around?
> 
> Thanks,
> Bryan
> 
> >Hello,
> >I wonder, is there some way to get debuger working on N64 target?
> >Thanks,
> >Maxim
> 
> >>On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 05:42:25PM +0400, Maxim Osipov wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have a problem trying to debug 64-bit mips binary with gdb-6.3. It
> >> fails with the following message:
> >>
> >> /home # gdb 64test
> >> GNU gdb 6.3
> >> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> >> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you
> are
> >> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
> conditions.
> >> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
> >> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for
> details.
> >> This GDB was configured as "mips64-linux-gnu"...
> >> ../../gdb-6.3/gdb/dwarf2-frame.c:1411: internal-error:
> >> decode_frame_entry_1: Assertion `fde->cie != NULL' failed.
> 
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>