linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Battery status

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Battery status
From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:07:58 -0500
Cc: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@linux.it>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20050722212357.GE3770@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20050722142205.GE21044@enneenne.com> <1122044036.10743.5.camel@riff> <20050722191732.GB3770@linux-mips.org> <1122066616.10743.33.camel@riff> <20050722212357.GE3770@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 17:23 -0400, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 04:10:16PM -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
> 
> > > Forget it.  One of the great advantages of MIPS is that Intel has ACPI.
> > > On the open Richter scale for stupidity ACPI in computing is a 9.8.
> > 
> > I never said that I liked ACPI, just that I liked the /proc interface.
> > I'm not really a fan of putting an interpreter into the system
> > firmware...
> 
> Okay.  I was assuming of somebody says ACPI he must mean ACPI ...

Heh. You and David Woodhouse both go nuclear when someone says ACPI :)

Clark

-- 
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>