| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x |
| From: | "Alexander Voropay" <alec@artcoms.ru> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:24:15 +0400 |
| Cc: | <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| Organization: | Art Communications |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <f07e6e05071909301c212ab4@mail.gmail.com> <20050719164427.GB8758@linux-mips.org> <f07e6e05071910194bab9b16@mail.gmail.com> <1121802786.7285.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507200955390.30702@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <f07e6e05072002197b529b72@mail.gmail.com> <010901c58d28$15e2a3b0$6cf9a8c0@ALEC> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507201347350.30702@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Reply-to: | "Alexander Voropay" <alec@artcoms.ru> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> wrote: There were discussions as to whether reuse R_MIPS_PC16 for branches or not. Unfortunately I don't remember the conclusion -- you'd have to find it out yourself. http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00447.html (follow thread) Seems, binutils people have removed this in more recent binutils versions. MIPS SDE is more conservative there. -- -=AV=- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x, Thiemo Seufer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x, Thiemo Seufer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x, Thiemo Seufer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |