linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x
From: "Alexander Voropay" <alec@artcoms.ru>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:24:15 +0400
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Organization: Art Communications
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <f07e6e05071909301c212ab4@mail.gmail.com> <20050719164427.GB8758@linux-mips.org> <f07e6e05071910194bab9b16@mail.gmail.com> <1121802786.7285.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507200955390.30702@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <f07e6e05072002197b529b72@mail.gmail.com> <010901c58d28$15e2a3b0$6cf9a8c0@ALEC> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507201347350.30702@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Reply-to: "Alexander Voropay" <alec@artcoms.ru>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> wrote:

There were discussions as to whether reuse R_MIPS_PC16 for branches or not. Unfortunately I don't remember the conclusion -- you'd have to find it out yourself.

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00447.html  (follow thread)

Seems, binutils people have removed this in more recent binutils versions.
MIPS SDE is more conservative there.

--
-=AV=-

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>