| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:17:06 +0200 |
| Cc: | Pete Popov <ppopov@embeddedalley.com>, Kishore K <hellokishore@gmail.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, "'linux-mips@linux-mips.org'" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507200955390.30702@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <f07e6e05071909301c212ab4@mail.gmail.com> <20050719164427.GB8758@linux-mips.org> <f07e6e05071910194bab9b16@mail.gmail.com> <1121802786.7285.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507200955390.30702@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Pete Popov wrote: > > > Try the attached patch instead. > > Apart from other changes why not simply s/bal/jal/? Your proposed code > is bad if ever to be built to a 64-bit object. Non-PIC jal isn't relocateable, the PIC jal wants a regular stack frame, and the end of the patch shows the 32bit assumption was already made earlier. :-) Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x, Kishore K |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |