[Top] [All Lists]

Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x

To: Pete Popov <>
Subject: Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:59:27 +0100 (BST)
Cc: Kishore K <>, Ralf Baechle <>, "''" <>
In-reply-to: <1121802786.7285.88.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <1121802786.7285.88.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Pete Popov wrote:

> Try the attached patch instead.

 Apart from other changes why not simply s/bal/jal/?  Your proposed code 
is bad if ever to be built to a 64-bit object.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>