| To: | Pete Popov <ppopov@embeddedalley.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:59:27 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | Kishore K <hellokishore@gmail.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, "'linux-mips@linux-mips.org'" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <1121802786.7285.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <f07e6e05071909301c212ab4@mail.gmail.com> <20050719164427.GB8758@linux-mips.org> <f07e6e05071910194bab9b16@mail.gmail.com> <1121802786.7285.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Pete Popov wrote: > Try the attached patch instead. Apart from other changes why not simply s/bal/jal/? Your proposed code is bad if ever to be built to a 64-bit object. Maciej |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: remote debugging: "Reply contains invalid hex digit 59", Maxim Osipov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x, Thiemo Seufer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x, Pete Popov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bal instruction in gcc 3.x, Thiemo Seufer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |