| To: | Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@linux.it> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12? |
| From: | Pete Popov <ppopov@embeddedalley.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:30:05 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050718161949.GB28995@enneenne.com> |
| Organization: | Embedded Alley Solutions, Inc |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20050716124205.GA26127@enneenne.com> <1121528575.27121.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050718161949.GB28995@enneenne.com> |
| Reply-to: | ppopov@embeddedalley.com |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 18:19 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 08:42:55AM -0700, Pete Popov wrote: > > I fixed this is the latest tree a couple of days ago. > > Something is still wrong... I just downloaded the whole linux-mips > tree from the CVS (to avoid conflics with my local reporitory) and > after the commands: > > # make pb1100_defconfig > # make > > I get: > > arch/mips/mm/ioremap.c: In function `__ioremap': > include/asm-mips/mach-au1x00/ioremap.h:15: sorry, unimplemented: inlining > failed in call to '__fixup_bigphys_addr': function body not available > arch/mips/mm/ioremap.c:28: sorry, unimplemented: called from here > make[1]: *** [arch/mips/mm/ioremap.o] Error 1 > make: *** [arch/mips/mm] Error 2 Oh, pb boards ... I haven't done any maintenance on the Pb boards in 2.6. AMD wasn't interested in moving them forward and I don't have time to build and test kernels for so many boards, so I'm not sure what to do with them. The db1500/1550 should build just fine. Take a look at the kernel support for those boards, and it shouldn't be too hard to update the pb1100. Thanks, Pete |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Rodolfo Giometti |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Rodolfo Giometti |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |