| To: | Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@linux.it> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12? |
| From: | Pete Popov <ppopov@embeddedalley.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:22:04 -0700 |
| Cc: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050717105853.GA21844@enneenne.com> |
| Organization: | Embedded Alley Solutions, Inc |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20050716124205.GA26127@enneenne.com> <1121528575.27121.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050717105853.GA21844@enneenne.com> |
| Reply-to: | ppopov@embeddedalley.com |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 12:58 +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 08:42:55AM -0700, Pete Popov wrote: > > I fixed this is the latest tree a couple of days ago. > > Great! :) > > Did you already publish it? I checked the linux-mips CVS before > sending my patches but I saw nothing about it. :-o > > Where can I get your patch in order to compare the two solutions? Just do a cvs update in your directory and you'll get the patch. Pete |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Rodolfo Giometti |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Rodolfo Giometti |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Rodolfo Giometti |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Rodolfo Giometti |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |