linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?

from [Rodolfo Giometti] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Pete Popov <ppopov@embeddedalley.com>
Subject: Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?
From: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@linux.it>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:58:53 +0200
Cc: linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <1121528575.27121.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Organization: Programmi e soluzioni GNU/Linux
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20050716124205.GA26127@enneenne.com> <1121528575.27121.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i 
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 08:42:55AM -0700, Pete Popov wrote:
> I fixed this is the latest tree a couple of days ago.

Great! :)

Did you already publish it? I checked the linux-mips CVS before
sending my patches but I saw nothing about it. :-o

Where can I get your patch in order to compare the two solutions?

Thanks,

Rodolfo

-- 

GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail:    giometti@linux.it
Linux Device Driver                             giometti@enneenne.com
Embedded Systems                     home page: giometti.enneenne.com
UNIX programming                     phone:     +39 349 2432127

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Pete Popov
Next by Date:  Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Pete Popov
Previous by Thread:  Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Pete Popov
Next by Thread:  Re: Support for (au1100) 64-bit physical address space broken on 2.6.12?, Pete Popov
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]