| To: | Alex Gonzalez <linux-mips@packetvision.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Benchmarking RM9000 |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:14:19 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <1120833749.28569.965.camel@euskadi.packetvision> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20050708091711Z8226352-3678+1954@linux-mips.org> <20050708120238.GA2816@linux-mips.org> <1120825549.28569.949.camel@euskadi.packetvision> <20050708130131.GC2816@linux-mips.org> <1120833749.28569.965.camel@euskadi.packetvision> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:42:29PM +0100, Alex Gonzalez wrote: > The performance of our video application is well below our expectations. > We are still doing some profiling work on it, but we are also looking at > other possibilities. > > What other benchmarking tool would you recommend? > > Currently it's a NFS mounted system, but even if we could use a block > device the access speed wouldn't be more than 1.5 Mbps, so that is a > limitation for the benchmark. As a shot into the dark ... Make sure you exploit the RM9000's write-gathering capabilities when writing into the frame buffer. If the frame buffer happens to be on a PCI device you're probably performing uncached writes which will slow down the thing to a crawl. Ralf |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 4/82] remove linux/version.h include from arch/mips, Olaf Hering |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Benchmarking RM9000, Alex Gonzalez |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Benchmarking RM9000, Alex Gonzalez |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |