linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:55:52 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507081309530.25104@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20050708091711Z8226352-3678+1954@linux-mips.org> <20050708120238.GA2816@linux-mips.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507081309530.25104@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 01:12:55PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

> > >   Protect noat assembly with .set push/pop and make it somewhat readable.
> > 
> > It doesn't need protction.
> 
>  Are you absolutely sure future versions of GCC won't default to ".set 
> noat" for inline asm?  I am not; in fact the opposite is not unlikely.

Indeed - but everybody is free to shoot himself into the foot.  With
uzis even.  Does that make it a good idea?

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>