| To: | Alex Gonzalez <linux-mips@packetvision.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Benchmarking RM9000 |
| From: | Laurence Darby <ldarby@mips.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:54:54 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <1120825549.28569.949.camel@euskadi.packetvision> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20050708091711Z8226352-3678+1954@linux-mips.org> <20050708120238.GA2816@linux-mips.org> <1120825549.28569.949.camel@euskadi.packetvision> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Alex Gonzalez wrote: > Hi, > > I am doing some basic benchmarking tests on our RM9000 based platform, > running on just one of the two cores (non-smp kernel). <snip> > TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index > : : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233* > --------------------:------------------:-------------:------------> > NUMERIC SORT : 360.48 : 9.24 : 3.04 I'd expect a K6 to be able to do more Iterations per second than a Pentium 90, not fewer. Laurence |
| Previous by Date: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux, Richard Sandiford |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Benchmarking RM9000, Alex Gonzalez |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Benchmarking RM9000, Alex Gonzalez |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |