[Top] [All Lists]

Re: booting error on db1550 using linux 2.6.12 from

To: Alan Cox <>
Subject: Re: booting error on db1550 using linux 2.6.12 from
From: rolf liu <>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:27:13 -0700
Cc:, "" <>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta;; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rZmt+YUOTF7Y1USzcojm++pU0WehXF0tKI3Qj2RhlkUom5LmFAqGFsg2H8tYL2eDZIsVGIO7fchblveaaGZQ2vxgjb8Igog26JLGHPQ6urje1lUvZaG90TGn+g39Nuk33I0rB9HF+lpZRBlQoRb79WkPO0OlQw8RLgGxGn2YSiQ=
In-reply-to: <1120776436.317.57.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <1120253048.5987.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <> <1120257851.5987.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> <> <1120756200.317.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <> <1120776436.317.57.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: rolf liu <>
I don't have hardware now and will try that option tomorrow. But I
remembered I got the same output before I applied your patch. I wonder
if using the PCI clock as the sole input can help. I read about the
source code provide by HighPoint Technologies. They use
"pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x5b, 0x21);" instead of
"pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x5b, 0x23);".

will let you know the result tomorrow.


On 7/7/05, Alan Cox <> wrote:
> On Iau, 2005-07-07 at 19:42, rolf liu wrote:
> > Alan,
> > Tried your patch on db1550 and linux 2.6.12. It still doesn't work.
> > During the boot-up, the kernel will hang up right after it prints out:
> >
> > >>hdg: max request size: 128 KiB
> > Any suggestion?
> Its got started if it gets that far because the LBA48 status has been
> checked. What occurs if you boot with ide=nodma ?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>