| To: | Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:42:39 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20050707162959.GQ2822@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20050707091937Z8226163-3678+1737@linux-mips.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507071227170.3205@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20050707121235.GV1645@hattusa.textio> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507071314010.3205@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20050707122226.GW1645@hattusa.textio> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507071356450.3205@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20050707162959.GQ2822@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Ralf Baechle DL5RB wrote: > > And they are actually used to implement these "-EL" and "-EB" options. > > Frankly I find "-mel" and "-meb" more consistent with the others as "-m*" > > generally imply target-specific options. > > -EB / -EL are traditionally the options that all MIPS compilers including > non-gcc compilers, seem to support. That's probably why they are there in GCC at all, but they are rather inconsistent with the rest of GCC options and we rely on GCC for builds anyway, so who cares? Maciej |
| Previous by Date: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux, Ralf Baechle DL5RB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: booting error on db1550 using linux 2.6.12 from linux-mips.org, Alan Cox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux, Ralf Baechle DL5RB |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux, Richard Sandiford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |