linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux
From: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:22:26 +0200
Cc: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507071314010.3205@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20050707091937Z8226163-3678+1737@linux-mips.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507071227170.3205@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20050707121235.GV1645@hattusa.textio> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507071314010.3205@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> 
> > -mel/-meb aren't documented.
> 
>  They are:
> 
> $ gcc -v --help 2>/dev/null | egrep 'mel|meb'
>   -mel                      Use little-endian byte order
>   -meb                      Use big-endian byte order
> 
> They are not in the info pages, but that should probably be considered an 
> accidental omission.  Is using something that's documented but doesn't 
> work, to the contrary, any better?

Probably not. It's just that I've never seen actual use of -mel/-meb yet.


Thiemo

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>