| To: | Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:19:31 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20050707121235.GV1645@hattusa.textio> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20050707091937Z8226163-3678+1737@linux-mips.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0507071227170.3205@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20050707121235.GV1645@hattusa.textio> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > -mel/-meb aren't documented. They are: $ gcc -v --help 2>/dev/null | egrep 'mel|meb' -mel Use little-endian byte order -meb Use big-endian byte order They are not in the info pages, but that should probably be considered an accidental omission. Is using something that's documented but doesn't work, to the contrary, any better? Maciej |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux, Thiemo Seufer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux, Thiemo Seufer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux, Thiemo Seufer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: CVS Update@linux-mips.org: linux, Thiemo Seufer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |