linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: preempt_schedule_irq missing from mfinfo[]?

To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: preempt_schedule_irq missing from mfinfo[]?
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:58:50 +0100 (BST)
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, djohnson+linuxmips@sw.starentnetworks.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20050706.122912.71087098.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <17093.19241.353160.946039@cortez.sw.starentnetworks.com> <20050703.005921.25910131.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20050705200308.GE18772@linux-mips.org> <20050706.122912.71087098.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> Yes, but many sleeping/scheduling (such as schedule_timeout(),
> __down(), etc.)  are compiled without -fno-omit-frame-pointer, so
> you can not find the caller of such functions anyway.

 Of course you can -- __builtin_return_address().  It should be enough for 
`ps' to fetch useful data from "System.map", shouldn't it?

  Maciej

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>