Re: [patch 4/5] SiByte fixes for 2.6.12

["Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>]

On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Andy Isaacson wrote:

> The code looks like it's structured to be able to be compiled with
> support for multiple CPUs, say, r4k and SB1; using #error would seem to
> prevent that.
> 
> With the code as currently structured, you don't know it's going to be a
> noop until runtime comes along and cpu_has_4ktlb is true...

 Well, I've had a look at the code and it's such a mess.  Obviously 
calling ld_mmu_r4xx0() (or any of the other variants) should not be 
compiled conditionally and more specific cases, i.e. based on PRId values 
should take precedence.  I'll see if I can make it better.

  Maciej