linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: glibc-2.3.4 mips64 compilation failure

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: glibc-2.3.4 mips64 compilation failure
From: Maxim Osipov <maxim.osipov@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 14:15:13 +0400
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jy4nJr/yDJe+E1jiVaWCSxITziao/z6CWBsVGqakyU7dnxrn/iugAc65+hxikHEhwCTYTT0Ibmy5AK/2KSY3HAw/s7pci/SzoFO0aF2mbu4pY343IuA9T1JFeyNfQUnd5+KNRRN2ssqynWFR5sL9xXfZNXPJ5ju3B/bKfBF/z2Y=
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0505261815330.29423@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <6097c4905052609326a4c1232@mail.gmail.com> <20050526170603.GA13272@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0505261815330.29423@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Reply-to: maxim@mox.ru
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Hmm... I don't know. Both 2.4.26 and 2.6.10 headers do not contain
this call number in unistd.h for N64, but glibc tries to generate a
stub referencing to undefined __NR_sendfile64, and I got this
assembler error.

I tried various kernel/glibc configurations and result is the same -
we fail on sendfile64 or time.

Do anyone have a clue what is happening? AFAIK, some people already
had success building glibc for mips64. Probably I miss something?

Best regards,
Maxim


On 5/26/05, Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > > I am trying to build glibc-2.3.4 using binutils-2.15 and gcc-3.4.3
> > > from 
> > > ftp://ftp.linux-mips.org/pub/linux/mips/crossdev/i386-linux/mips64-linux.
> > > Compilation fails with following messages:
> >
> > Looks like your kernel headers are too old.
> 
>  Or too new, sigh...  See:
> "http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=758";.  Unfortunately
> it's not clear to me what "the 2.3 branch inclusion criteria" are and it's
> a pity the MIPS port of glibc is unmaintained these days...
> 
>   Maciej
> 
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>