| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Unmatched R_MIPS_HI16/R_MIPS_LO16 on gcc 3.5 |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 May 2005 16:00:08 +0100 |
| Cc: | Stanislaw Skowronek <sskowron@ET.PUT.Poznan.PL>, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0505241548330.13738@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.10.10505240857260.13676-100000@helios.et.put.poznan.pl> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0505241122290.13738@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20050524142245.GG4383@linux-mips.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0505241548330.13738@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:50:16PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > The kernel ELF binary is too complicated for objcopy to cope with. Fixing > > objcopy to handle this case correctly turned out to be hopeless but with > > a little linker script magic it's possible to keep the kernel vmlinux file > > within what elf2ecoff can deal with. > > Well, it used to work for me the few times I tried, except from that MIPS > III magic number problem. But that's not a binutils' fault. That's because you haven't booted 2.6 on DECstations yet ;-) I'm sure you'll have some elf2ecoff fun ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Unmatched R_MIPS_HI16/R_MIPS_LO16 on gcc 3.5, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Unmatched R_MIPS_HI16/R_MIPS_LO16 on gcc 3.5, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Unmatched R_MIPS_HI16/R_MIPS_LO16 on gcc 3.5, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Unmatched R_MIPS_HI16/R_MIPS_LO16 on gcc 3.5, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |