| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re[2]: 64 bit kernel for BCM1250 |
| From: | Jerry <jerry@wicomtechnologies.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 May 2005 18:26:09 +0300 |
| Cc: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0505191605350.10681@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20050519135207.7760.qmail@web32510.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0505191605350.10681@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Reply-to: | Jerry <jerry@wicomtechnologies.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Hello Maciej, Thursday, May 19, 2005, 6:19:14 PM, you wrote: > For 64-bit builds you probably want to use fairly recent versions or you > risk hitting serious bugs that used to exist in older versions. Using > David's patch (or preferably mine ;-) -- as available here: > "http://www.linux-mips.org/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=linux-mips&i=Pine.LNX.4.55.0406281509170.23162%40jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl"; > which I keep using with GCC 4.0.0) is probably the lesser evil. Without going into details - what difference between your and David's patch ? :) I'm in doubts which one is more suitable for me... ()_() -( ^,^ )- -[21398845]- -<The Bat! 3.0.1.33>- -<23/05/2005 18:18>- (") (") |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re[2]: 64 bit kernel for BCM1250, Jerry |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 64 bit kernel for BCM1250, David Daney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 64 bit kernel for BCM1250, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 64 bit kernel for BCM1250, David Daney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |