| To: | Ulrich Eckhardt <eckhardt@satorlaser.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: When code and comments disagree... |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:19:15 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <200504061700.53764.eckhardt@satorlaser.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <200504061700.53764.eckhardt@satorlaser.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 05:00:53PM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > ... both are probably wrong, as the saying goes. I stumbled across this line > in arch/mips/au1000/common/reset.c: > > au_writel(0x00, 0xb1900100); /* sys_pininputen */ > > However, 0xb1900100 is SYS_TRIOUTCLR, while SYS_PININPUTEN is 0xb1900110... > Which one is right now? > > Also, does the switch statement in that file make sense at all? I mean is it > possible to compile a kernel that runs on several Alchemy systems? Technically it's certainly possible to share kernels for many of the Linux/MIPS platforms but for an architecture that these days largely powers embedded platforms a generic kernel is of much less usefullnes than on PCs, for example. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 4kc machine check, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: memcpy prefetch, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | When code and comments disagree..., Ulrich Eckhardt |
| Next by Thread: | 4kc machine check, Greg Weeks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |