Jan-Benedict Glaw <email@example.com> wrote:
> Don't expect that sending a patch once always leads
> to it's prompt
> acceptance. Pushing a patch *can* involve resending
> it multiple times,
> over a long period of time. However, if a patch is
> in acceptable state
> (that is, a half-way readable coding style, no
> superfluous debugging
> output, ...), Ralf usually takes it quite fast.
Ok, I'll retry.
> That isn't all that easy, especially with CVS and
> especially if you want
> to keep patches in nicely separated changesets. With
> CVS, this
> unfortunately involves some manual work, or clever
Actually that's what I was looking for...
Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour
dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis. A télécharger gratuitement sur