linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 64bit compile of tulip driver

To: Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>
Subject: Re: 64bit compile of tulip driver
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:52:08 +0200
Cc: Linux MIPS List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <4249A5EE.9070006@jg555.com>
Mail-followup-to: Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>, Linux MIPS List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <4249A5EE.9070006@jg555.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
On Tue, 2005-03-29 11:01:02 -0800, Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>
wrote in message <4249A5EE.9070006@jg555.com>:
> Under 32bit the tulip driver works fine, but under 64 bit it gives me a 
> lot of grief.
> 
> First off it continually sends data out the network interface and never 
> negotiates is speed and duplex.
> Second in the log files all I see is an uninformative message 
> 0000:00:07.0: tulip_stop_rxtx() failed
> 
> Here is all the bootup information differences I can find on the driver
> 64 bit
> Dec 31 16:01:29 lfs tulip0: ***WARNING***: No MII transceiver found!
> Dec 31 16:01:29 lfs tulip1: ***WARNING***: No MII transceiver found!
> 32 bit
> Dec 31 16:01:16 lfs tulip0:  MII transceiver #1 config 1000 status 7809 
> advertising 01e1
> Dec 31 16:01:16 lfs tulip1:  MII transceiver #1 config 1000 status 7809 
> advertising 01e1.

That's all wrongly wrapped around. However, where's the patch?

MfG, JBG

-- 
Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481             _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg  _ _ O
 fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!   O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>