linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IPTables 1.3.x fails on RaQ2

To: Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>
Subject: Re: IPTables 1.3.x fails on RaQ2
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:37:00 +0000
Cc: Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org>, Linux MIPS List <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <422DD318.9020804@jg555.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <422C8D6A.6060904@jg555.com> <422C9142.8090007@gmx.net> <422D0D64.2080402@gentoo.org> <422D2801.2060903@jg555.com> <422D3AC9.4020601@gentoo.org> <422D4A49.9020504@gmx.net> <422D55B6.4010300@jg555.com> <20050308132408.GB9811@linux-mips.org> <422DD318.9020804@jg555.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 08:30:16AM -0800, Jim Gifford wrote:

> Ralf and other Linux-MIPS readers,
>    I checked the linux-libc-headers for those files, and they are not 
> there. I'm tried fighting this battle with netfilter before and they 
> won't budge from the fact that they build iptables from the headers in 
> /usr/src/linux, if you use my make KERNEL_DIR=/usr, the problem doesn't 
> exist it's only when we build from the raw kernel headers. So what 
> method is the proper method, building from the raw headers or santized 
> ones like linux-libc?

The sucky but official policy Linus has given out is that userland should
not include kernel headers.  Which means anything else is ok.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>