Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
O64 may not be supported ABI, but it provides us with a feature that is really
specifically, it generates 32 bit symbol addresses instead of 64 bit ones.
down on code size considerably. If this feature was implemented in toolchain
switch, O64 hack could go away.
Well, the topic has been beaten to death here, so you don't really need
to illuminate me -- it's only due to this popular request I've implemented
the ability to do 32-bit builds for 64-bit kernel. I just wonder why
people insisting on such a setup don't actually contribute some code to do
that cleanly and keep switching between hacks as they stop working one by
I believe it was mentioned at some point in time by someone that using "n32"
inplace of "o64" might have a similar affect of "o64", but I can't recall what
the outcome of that actually was (or whether or not it ever worked).
As if I could be any more vague.
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small
hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere."