On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:57:14AM +0100, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> I presume CKSEG is CKSEG0 in the above patch. With that it works
> about the same as before. So do you have any clue what the problem
> behind all that really is? Furthermore I still have all those
> "Illegal instruction" and "Segmentation fault" messages that
> shouldn't be there.
Sorry, yes I indeed meant CKSEG0. And this version of the patch really was
only meant to optimize the large performance impact your previous patch
had; it wasn't meant to fix anything beyond that.
As I can't replicate your configuration I'm still starring at the code to
find what's wrong ...