| To: | Stanislaw Skowronek <sskowron@ET.PUT.Poznan.PL> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch like kexec for MIPS possible? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:56:49 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.10.10502052025001.1535-100000@helios.et.put.poznan.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20050205174150.GU28252@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10502052025001.1535-100000@helios.et.put.poznan.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:26:04PM +0100, Stanislaw Skowronek wrote: > > Frankly, I don't see what kexec is good for. Who else besides > > kernel developers would need to reboot a machine continuously? > > Yeah. And, speaking from experience, it is often caused by the hardware > entering such an invalid state that requires a hard reset anyway. I guess only the big iron fraction among us will really be missing something like kexec - firmware reinitialization may take minutes on that calibre of system so being able to get around that would be a good thing. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patch like kexec for MIPS possible?, Wolfgang Denk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch like kexec for MIPS possible?, Stanislaw Skowronek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch like kexec for MIPS possible?, Stanislaw Skowronek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patch like kexec for MIPS possible?, Stanislaw Skowronek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |