| To: | Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: patch like kexec for MIPS possible? |
| From: | Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 5 Feb 2005 20:01:46 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, Robert Michel <news@robertmichel.de> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050205203333.CD4DBC108D@atlas.denx.de> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20050205203333.CD4DBC108D@atlas.denx.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Feb 5, 2005, at 3:33 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: ..... but I cannot see many situations where kexec is actually better or more powerful than a decent bootloader line U-Boot. OK, I'm obviously biased.
I agree. I've played with booting kernels from kernels
in both PowerPC and MIPS in the past, and the problem
I always run into is drivers or kernel functions that assume
a particular power up state. When rebooting from another
kernel you don't have the same state as from power up, and
some software doesn't like this. I suspect main reason for
kexec is the horrible x86 bios and nothing that can be done
about it.
Oh, and I agree with your assessment, not that you are biased :-)
-- Dan
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: patch like kexec for MIPS possible?, Thiemo Seufer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch like kexec for MIPS possible?, Wolfgang Denk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: patch like kexec for MIPS possible?, Wolfgang Denk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: patch like kexec for MIPS possible?, Wolfgang Denk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |