| To: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc1] add local_irq_enable() to cpu_idle() |
| From: | Yoichi Yuasa <yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:11:59 +0900 |
| Cc: | yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <41EBEEFA.6040701@mips.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20050118014958.1d9e484e.yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp> <41EBEEFA.6040701@mips.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:59:38 +0100 "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com> wrote: > There have been times when having local_irq_enable() in my idle loop > would have prevented a hang in some of my experimental kernels, too, > but it's always been because I had screwed up somewhere else and > forgotten to re-enable interrupts. Is there some good reason why > the kernel should end up in idle with interrupts turned off? After call local_irq_disable(), rest_init()(in init/main.c) calls cpu_idle(). Yoichi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc1] add local_irq_enable() to cpu_idle(), Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Great! 2.6.11 seems to support oProfile, colin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc1] add local_irq_enable() to cpu_idle(), Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc1] add local_irq_enable() to cpu_idle(), Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |