linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] I/O helpers rework

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@mips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] I/O helpers rework
From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:12:40 +0000
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, macro@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501101750420.18023@perivale.mips.com> (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:11:14 +0000 (GMT)")
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412151936460.14855@perivale.mips.com> <20050107.004521.74752947.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501101503020.18023@perivale.mips.com> <20050111.022138.25909508.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501101750420.18023@perivale.mips.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@mips.com> writes:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
>
>> Well, maybe the 'volatile' have no sense, but some archs (including
>> i386, of course :-)) and some drivers use it.  Adding the 'volatile'
>> will remove some compiler warnings.
>
>  As will removing "volatile" from broken ports.

There's nothing wrong with "volatile void *".

Richard

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>