Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> >Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> >>Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> >>>I updated the patch now and checked it in. Please test, especially
> >>>for cases I couldn't do, like R3000-style TLB handling and MIPS32
> >>>CPUs with 64bit physaddr.
> >>My Yosemite board (RM9000 processor) does not boot anymore with
> >>CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR. Without that option it seems to be working
> >>as before. I tried to define cpu_has_64bit_gp_regs.
> >Correct, this should always be defined for 64bit capable CPUs.
> Ok. But before it was working without that setting.
100% pure luck. :-)
> Furthermore, without cpu_has_64bit_gp_regs and without
> CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR I get a working kernel. With
> cpu_has_64bit_gp_regs defined the kernel fails with
> or without CONFIG_64BIT_PHYS_ADDR.
This would be a different bug then. It should be relatively easy to
catch, there aren't that many places where cpu_has_64bit_gp_regs is
> >>With that it boots partly.
> >Where does it fail?
> Actually the kernel seems to boot completely
> but never starts init. It just stops after the
> last line.
Ok. The patch I posted will hopefully fix that.