| To: | wuming <wuming@ict.ac.cn> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: problem about dma |
| From: | Fuxin Zhang <fxzhang@ict.ac.cn> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:14:16 +0800 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <002101c4e679$72938bc0$6f64a8c0@spark> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <001501c4e646$7f676c00$6f64a8c0@spark> <41C690CF.2010306@niisi.msk.ru> <002101c4e679$72938bc0$6f64a8c0@spark> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 |
I think that speculative loads may be the answer. wuming wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gleb O. Raiko" <raiko@niisi.msk.ru>To: "wuming" <wuming@ict.ac.cn> Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 4:43 PM Subject: Re: problem about dmaIn 2.4, memcpy's prefetch may (and, in practice, do, no smiles, it cost me a lot of time to realize) access that memory. I though it has been fixed in 2.6 someday.Regards, Gleb.Thank you! :)But I think it is not the only reason, because the CPU on my platform does not support the "pref" instruction. So, memcpy's prefetch may have no effect on that arrange of memory. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Patch] Au1550 PSC SPI irq mask fix, Jon Anders Haugum |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ip22zilog serial console, peter fuerst |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: problem about dma, wuming |
| Next by Thread: | [Patch] Au1550 PSC SPI irq mask fix, Jon Anders Haugum |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |