linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: kernel 2.6.9 patch

To: "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>, "Linux MIPS mailing list" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.9 patch
From: "Tatsuya Koseki" <koseki@shimafuji.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:53:41 +0900
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <009001c4e1ba$54a431f0$2100a8c0@koseki> <20041215131753.GC27935@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
I find this message,
  http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2004-10/msg00256.html

Thank you  for reply.


> On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 05:53:02PM +0900, Tatsuya Koseki wrote:
> 
> > Subject: kernel 2.6.9 patch
> > Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:53:02 +0900
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="iso-2022-jp"
> > 
> > Please review 
> > 
> > 
> > --- linux/include/asm/stackframe.h.old Tue Dec 14 17:49:38 2004
> > +++ linux/include/asm/stackframe.h Tue Dec 14 17:50:35 2004
> > @@ -244,6 +244,10 @@
> >    nor v1, $0, v1
> >    and v0, v1
> >    or v0, a0
> > +
> > +  li v1,2
> > +  or v0,v1
> > +
> >    mtc0 v0, CP0_STATUS
> >    LONG_L v1, PT_EPC(sp)
> >    MTC0 v1, CP0_EPC
> 
>  o Your patch got corrupted by using a differnet indentation so couldn't be
>    applied anyway
>  o When posting a patch, post an explanation.  If the purpose of a patch
>    isn't obvious it'll likely be ignroed.
>  o This bug was already fixed in CVS.
>  o The issue only affected new-born processes, so there is no reason to
>    burden the fix on every exception taken.
>  o Why using two instruction if one would be sufficient.
> 
>   Ralf
> 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>