| To: | David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Patch] make 2.4 compile with GCC-3.4.3... |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Dec 2004 07:40:17 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <69397FFCADEFD94F8D5A0FC0FDBCBBDEF4FA@avtrex-server.hq.avtrex.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <69397FFCADEFD94F8D5A0FC0FDBCBBDEF4FA@avtrex-server.hq.avtrex.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6i |
David Daney wrote: [snip] > -fno-unit-at-a-time prevents GCC from rearranging things in its output thus > preventing > the save_static_function() from being separated from its companion. As far > as I could tell > only syscall.c and signal.c need this. Ah, I missed that. It's probably better to use the same way as in 2.6, that is, to add a jump at the end of save_static_function(). > noinline was not defined for me :( so I removed it. It seems that in 2.6 it > is > just #defined to be nothing. The alternative is to add: > > #ifndef noinline > #define noinline > #endif > > to compiler.h as is done in 2.6 Yes, that's the better idea. gcc-4.0 ff may need it. Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Patch] make 2.4 compile with GCC-3.4.3..., David Daney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Linux/MIPS expertise needed for reviewers, Dominic Sweetman |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Patch] make 2.4 compile with GCC-3.4.3..., David Daney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Patch] make 2.4 compile with GCC-3.4.3..., Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |