And what constraints are there on your choice of gcc version? - it would be easier if 3.4 was OK.3.2/3.3 are known to work. 3.4 fails for yet unknown reason, I guess either due to inline assembler changes or more agressive dead code elimination. Thiemo For what it's worth, I'm running 64-bit kernels on my O2 and Indy that were compiled with gcc 3.4.3, and I have had no problems. Steve |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Improve atomic.h implementation robustness, Thiemo Seufer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Improve atomic.h implementation robustness, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Improve atomic.h implementation robustness, Thiemo Seufer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Improve atomic.h implementation robustness, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |