| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] 2.4: Preemption fixes for Broadcom DMA Page operations |
| From: | Manish Lachwani <mlachwani@mvista.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:58:19 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0412020041420.20966@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20041202003308.GA13085@prometheus.mvista.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0412020041420.20966@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 |
Hi Maciej, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Manish Lachwani wrote:The attached patch implements preempt_disable/preempt_enable around the SB1 DMA page operations. Please review ...Why is it needed? Also I think these: - if [ "$CONFIG_SIBYTE_SB1250" = "y" ]; then + if [ "$CONFIG_SIBYTE_BOARD" = "y" ]; thenare unrelated and inaccurate. The devices are internal to the SoCs and not strictly board-dependent. How about:+ if [ "$CONFIG_SIBYTE_SB1250" = "y" || "$CONFIG_SIBYTE_BCM112X" = "y"]; then Actually, this makes more sense. I will send a new patch Thanks Manish Lachwani at the very least, or perhaps using reverse dependencies? Maciej |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] 2.4: Preemption fixes for Broadcom DMA Page operations, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Improve atomic.h implementation robustness, Thiemo Seufer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] 2.4: Preemption fixes for Broadcom DMA Page operations, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Broadcom SWARM IDE in 2.6, Steven J. Hill |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |