| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Cache Question |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Nov 2004 23:54:37 +0100 |
| Cc: | "Kapoor, Pankaj" <pkapoor@ti.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0411242241130.843@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <C4D23DECD6CD714BBFB38B0AE8D25A3A24FF66@dlee2k03.ent.ti.com> <20041124223211.GB22439@linux-mips.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0411242241130.843@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 10:42:45PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > That interrupt disabling in some cache flushes dates back further than > > CVS history. Seems once uppon a time there was some CPU which didn't > > like cache flushes with interrupts enabled. This is rather bad for > > latencies so unless somebody else on this list recalls a good reason > > I'd like to remove this. > > Some R4600 (v1.1?) errata workaround? Or was it elsewhere? V1.7 you mean - it identifies as 1.0 in c0_prid though. I don't have my erratas for this one anymore. I've checked erratum #3 of V2.0 with one of the R4600 designers already a while ago and he said disabling interrupts isn't necessary. The ancient Linux code I was refering to used to disable interrupts for all CPUs. Supported CPUs back then were R4000, R4400, R4600 only, so it must have been one of those. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Cross tool chain based on gcc-3.4.x, TheNop |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Cross tool chain based on gcc-3.4.x, TheNop |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Cache Question, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Cross tool chain based on gcc-3.4.x, TheNop |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |