| To: | ralf@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: gcc 3.3.4/3.4.1 and get_user |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:15:20 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20041112134440.GA7588@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20040920171021.GA25371@linux-mips.org> <20041104.153744.122623401.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20041112134440.GA7588@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:44:40 +0100, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> >>>>> said: ralf> Right, part of the same mistake. See the patch below which gets ralf> my test system working. The 32-bit parts are cosmetic and ralf> shouldn't change the generated code. They just make the 32-bit ralf> and 64-bit str*_user.S files almost identical. Thank you. They work fine. ralf> I'm surprised somebody still cares about 2.4 64-bit ;-) The ralf> 64-bit improvments in 2.6, especially in the area of the 32-bit ralf> compatibility code are so substancial that I don't think 2.4 is ralf> still a good choice. Yes, I agree that 2.6 is better. I just want to run 2.4 64-bit for comparison from time to time. (only when something failed on 2.6 :-)) --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH]: Rewrite of arch/mips/ramdisk/, Kumba |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [no subject], macrohat |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: gcc 3.3.4/3.4.1 and get_user, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] The compiler's revenge, Thomas Koeller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |