linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Function / prototype mismatch

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Function / prototype mismatch
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 13:59:12 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Thomas Koeller <thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20041109125418.GC5652@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <200411091328.42360.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com> <20041109124547.GA5766@lst.de> <20041109125418.GC5652@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:54:18PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 01:45:47PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > <hint>
> > might be worse to switch mips to the generic kernel/irq/ code
> > whicg gets this right
> > </hint>
> 
> <hint>
> This has long happened and generic irq code doesn't even cover do_IRQ.

Well, 90% of it as __do_IRQ ;-)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>