| To: | colin <colin@realtek.com.tw> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or Montavista? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:14:30 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <007801c4bb2a$9e7ded90$8b1a13ac@realtek.com.tw> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <007801c4bb2a$9e7ded90$8b1a13ac@realtek.com.tw> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:08:34PM +0800, colin wrote: > Hi all, > We want to begin to put Linux to our new board with 4KEc CPU. > Is it better to start porting from Montavista's Kernel, or from the one of > linux-mips.org? > I phoned the sales of Montavista and he told me the difference of these 2 > kernels are little, but their kernels have been tested a lot for stability. A kernel isn't everything you'd get from Montavista; the comparison of a site that's primarily geared towards development and a company that is selling is probably not appropriate ... > Naturally, we would like to choose the kernel version above 2.6. The time where choosing 2.4 for new project still did make sense is over. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Toshiba RBHMA3100 IRQ handling, Pavel Kiryukhin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [buildroot] Compilation failure on MIPS with 2.6.9.1 kernel headers, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or Montavista?, Pete Popov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or Montavista?, colin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |