| To: | Pete Popov <ppopov@embeddedalley.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or Montavista? |
| From: | Manish Lachwani <mlachwani@mvista.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:10:17 -0700 |
| Cc: | colin <colin@realtek.com.tw>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <417DF8BC.4080001@embeddedalley.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <007801c4bb2a$9e7ded90$8b1a13ac@realtek.com.tw> <417DF8BC.4080001@embeddedalley.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.2) Gecko/20040308 |
Pete Popov wrote: colin wrote:Hi all, We want to begin to put Linux to our new board with 4KEc CPU. Is it better to start porting from Montavista's Kernel, or from the one of linux-mips.org? I phoned the sales of Montavista and he told me the difference of these 2 kernels are little, but their kernels have been tested a lot for stability. Naturally, we would like to choose the kernel version above 2.6.I don't believe MV currently offers a 2.6 based MIPS distro. Pete Hello !Montavista has a 2.6 eval release that has support for this CPU. Among the boards that are supported includes Malta and SWARM Thanks Manish Lachwani |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: errors while insmoding usb-skeleton.o (changed to suit our requirements), Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or Montavista?, Pete Popov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or Montavista?, Pete Popov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Which MIPS kernel is good to start up? linux-mips.org or Montavista?, Pete Popov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |