[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] KSEG/CKSEG fixes

To: Tom Rini <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.9] KSEG/CKSEG fixes
From: Ralf Baechle <>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:21:46 +0200
Cc: Ladislav Michl <>,
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <20041021070921.GA2297@umax645sx> <>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 07:48:15AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:

> Would this include abstracting the notion of KSEG1/CKSEG1 into something
> where one name would get the right var on 32 or 64 ?  If so, is this in
> CVS now?  If not, wouldn't it make sense to put this in now and convert
> it when the changes do go in?

The plan was to use K0BASE / K1BASE and define them as appropriate for
a platform.  KSEG0 / KSEG1 / KSEG2 would always be 32-bit constants and
CKSEG0/1/2 always 64-bit.  Somebody recently screwed the latter with a


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>