| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:41:44 -0700 |
| Cc: | ak@suse.de, dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@m17n.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-390@vm.marist.edu, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20041020232509.GF995@wotan.suse.de> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <3506.1098283455@redhat.com> <20041020150149.7be06d6d.davem@davemloft.net> <20041020225625.GD995@wotan.suse.de> <20041020160450.0914270b.davem@davemloft.net> <20041020232509.GF995@wotan.suse.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 01:25:09 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote: > IMHO breaking the build unnecessarily is extremly bad because > it will prevent all testing. And would you really want to hold > up the whole linux testing machinery just for some obscure > system call? IMHO not a good tradeoff. Then change the unistd.h cookie from "#error" to a "#warning". It accomplishes both of our goals. |
| Previous by Date: | Support for the third ethernet port on Titan 1.2 (2.4), Manish Lachwani |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Add key management syscalls to non-i386 archs, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |