linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Kernel 2.6 for R4600 Indy

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6 for R4600 Indy
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 21:04:08 +0200
Cc: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0410050044510.14763@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <4152D58B.608@longlandclan.hopto.org> <20040923154855.GA2550@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20041002185057.GN21351@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20041002204014.GO21351@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0410022213140.18388@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20041004145244.GB8198@linux-mips.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0410050044510.14763@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:48:37AM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

> 1. The handler is expected to be for R4000/R4400 only.  If it's used for

You're alone in that believe.  Despite it's name it's being used for
anything that doesn't need it's own special handler.

> 2. The except_vec0_sb1 handler is one with the nop omitted, so it can be
>    used for these processors.

Adding more obscurity?

> 3. Correct operation first, only then optimization.

On of the free software lessons is a bad solution is worse than no solution.

> 5. Given the "gran plan" as referred to above, points 1 - 4 above are
>    probably irrelevant anyway. ;-)

Only once implemented.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>