| To: | "linux-mips" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | why gcc 2.95.3 generate different result with option -mips2 and -mips3 for the same code |
| From: | "glame" <glchen@ict.ac.cn> |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:29:59 +0800 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
hi, when i disassemble the code, the result is as the following -ffffffff80010b8c: 01001021 move $v0,$t0 (-mips2) +ffffffff80010b8c: 0100102d move $v0,$t0 (-mips3) why? best regards glame |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] fix mips atomic_lock declaration, Peter Buckingham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: why gcc 2.95.3 generate different result with option -mips2 and -mips3 for the same code, Thiemo Seufer |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 2.6] fix mips atomic_lock declaration, Peter Buckingham |
| Next by Thread: | Re: why gcc 2.95.3 generate different result with option -mips2 and -mips3 for the same code, Thiemo Seufer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |