linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets

To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 17:03:28 -0700
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>, Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <873c1ytnxz.fsf@redhat.com>
Mail-followup-to: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>, Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20040810232020.GA21922@redhat.com> <87eklnw0g7.fsf@redhat.com> <20040903065331.GG20559@redhat.com> <87sm9zg7dg.fsf@redhat.com> <20040903070858.GA24082@redhat.com> <87oekng72k.fsf@redhat.com> <20040903072010.GD24082@redhat.com> <87k6vbg68s.fsf@redhat.com> <20040903201510.GB13228@redhat.com> <873c1ytnxz.fsf@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Sat, Sep 04, 2004 at 09:53:28AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> So, for example, the onus for verifying the ZERO_EXTRACT rewrites
> should be with combine rather than the backend.  Is that right?

Yes.


r~

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>