| To: | Alec Voropay <a.voropay@vmb-service.ru> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: anybody tried NPTL? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:19:21 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <036001c48923$31563350$1701a8c0@alec> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20040823122843.GB20905@linux-mips.org> <036001c48923$31563350$1701a8c0@alec> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 07:09:31PM +0400, Alec Voropay wrote: > OK, OK. You are right. However, as it is known, there is at > least one project "to bridge" Win32/multithread and *NIX : > WINE. > http://winehq.com/site/docs/wine-devel/x3398 > > Yes, the Win32/MIPS API (and ABI) is dead, but MIPS/multithreading > lives in the WindowsCE/MIPS HPCs. > > > Unfortunately, I can't find any details about Win32/MIPS > implementation. That's because for Windows on x86 there are tons of important binary-only applications available and Linux would have to be bought if they're available at all. On MIPS we're not in this dependency situation, so we hardly care about Win32. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: anybody tried NPTL?, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: anybody tried NPTL?, Jun Sun |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: anybody tried NPTL?, Alec Voropay |
| Next by Thread: | Re: anybody tried NPTL?, David Daney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |