| To: | Dominic Sweetman <dom@mips.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: anybody tried NPTL? |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:12:10 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <16676.46694.564448.344602@arsenal.mips.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20040804152936.D6269@mvista.com> <16676.46694.564448.344602@arsenal.mips.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6i |
Dominic Sweetman wrote: [snip] > So we're proposing: > > o The register name<->number mapping is that of n64. > > o Calling convention: register-, not slot-based. Each argument is > represented by a register value. Arguments 0-7 travel in registers > a0-7 (or fa0-7 as required for floating point types). This suggests to have no fp temporaries left: fv0-1, fa0-7, fs0-5. Is this intentional? Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PCMCIA genric sreail or modem support for db1100 bord, Michael Kelly |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: anybody tried NPTL?, Dominic Sweetman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: anybody tried NPTL?, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: anybody tried NPTL?, Dominic Sweetman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |