| To: | "Alec Voropay" <a.voropay@vmb-service.ru> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: anybody tried NPTL? |
| From: | Dominic Sweetman <dom@mips.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Aug 2004 23:07:03 -0700 |
| Cc: | "Dominic Sweetman" <dom@mips.com>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <006f01c485f9$41348b50$3c01a8c0@portege> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20040804152936.D6269@mvista.com> <16676.46694.564448.344602@arsenal.mips.com> <006f01c485f9$41348b50$3c01a8c0@portege> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Alec, > > We are working on our multi-threading extension to the MIPS > > architecture, and one of our longer-term aims is to achieve really > > good NPTL performance. > > Sorry for a bit offtopic..., as far as I remember, the Windows NT > MIPS edition has a working multithread implementation. Is this > implementation very copyrighted and is it possible to use something > ftom there for the NPTL implementation ? It's Microsoft, so yes it will be copyrighted and it would be better if our staff didn't even look at it. -- Dominic Sweetman MIPS Technologies |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | PCMCIA genric sreail or modem support for db1100 bord, safiudeen Ts |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: anybody tried NPTL?, Dominic Sweetman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: anybody tried NPTL?, Alec Voropay |
| Next by Thread: | Re: anybody tried NPTL?, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |